Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010187322018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7110/2018 JAY KANTA RAMCHIARY AND 6 ORS. S/O. LT. KALA RAMCHIARY, R/O. VILL. KHAIRATARY, P.O. RAMPUR (DEKEPARA), P.S. SARTHEBARI, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM. 2: MAHIPAL BORO S/O. LT. NARENDRA NATH BORO R/O. VILL. GOLIBANDHA P.O. GOLIBANDHA P.S. SARTHEBARI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 3: RATAN DAIMARY S/O. BALEN DAIMARY R/O. VILL. KUCHIJPAR P.O. BHAWANIPUR DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 4: UTSHB CH. BORO S/O. SRI GAJEN BORO R/O. VILL. GOLIBANDHA P.O. GOLIBANDHA P.S. SARTHABARI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 5: DEJEN RAMCHIARY S/O. LT. ARJUN RAMCHIARY R/O. VILL. BARAMACHARI P.O. BARAMACHARI Page No.# 2/4 DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 6: SMT. DIPIKA BORO W/O. SRI JATIN BASUMATARY R/O. VILL. KAHARA P.O. SARUPETA P.S. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 7: MRINAL DAIMARY S/O. LT. NABIN DAIMARY R/O. VILL. UPASNAI P.O. HELANA P.S. PATACHARKUCHI DIST. BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REP. BY CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWHATI- 06. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPTT. OF WELFARE OF PLAIN TRIBES AND BACKWARD CLASSES DISPUR GHY.-06. 3:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM. 4:THE JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPTT. OF WELFARE OF PLAIN TRIBES AND BACKWARD CLASSES DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 5:THE DIRECTOR Page No.# 3/4 WELFARE OF PLAIN TRIBES AND BACKWARD CLASSES ASSAM RUKMINI NAGAR GUWAHATI-06. 6:THE DY. COMMISSIONER BARPETA P.O. AND DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. 7:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR INTEGRATED BRIBAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BARPETA P.O. DIST. BARPETA ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. K BORUAH, MR. P THAKURIA,MR. R S MISHRA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, BTC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 21.04.2025 Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits on instructions that the shifting of the ITDP Office from Barpeta to Kajalgaon has not been done by the respondent authorities till date. Accordingly, he submits that he be permitted to withdraw the preset writ petition with liberty to assail any such decision taken in future for shifting of the ITDP Office from Barpeta to any other location. The prayer is not objected to by Mr. J. Handique, learned counsel for the state respondents. Page No.# 4/4 In view of the above the writ petition stands dismissed with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant