Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179873 (ALL)

JIYA LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/9310/2024 · 2025-12-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9310 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR/Case Crime No.494 of 2010, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC P.S. Bewana, District Ambedkar Nagar. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that daughter of the informant aged about 14 years was missing since 11.09.2010; FIR was lodged on 11.09.2010 itself. Subsequently, in her statement, the victim stated that she was enticed and taken to Akbarpur, thereafter to Lucknow and thereafter, to Delhi, and wrong was also committed. It was also stated that promise of marriage was made. Subsequently, the co-accused was enlarged on bail, however, as the applicant was staying in Delhi and did not appear for trial for 10 years, the bail application has been rejected. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the case is of the year 2010 and the applicant has now appeared and the co-accused has been enlarged on bail, the applicant who is in custody since 28.03.2023 and has explained his criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nitin Kumar Mishra, Ankur Kumar Panday, Manish Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jiya Lal .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Let the applicant Jiya Lal be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 3, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9310 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench