NEELAM DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.DEPTT.OF BASIC EDU.LKO. and ORS.
WRIA/16397/2016 · 2025-11-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179869 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 16397 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Case called out. None is present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, counsel for respondent no. no. 3 are present. The matter is listed under Chapter XII Rule 4 of the Allahabad High Court Rules. It is apparent that notices have been issued to the respondents, but the steps have not been taken as yet. This writ petition is dismissed accordingly. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Consigned to the records. November 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Umesh Kumar Shukla, Vindhyawashini Kumar (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Neelam Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Deptt.Of Basic Edu.Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench