Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179867 (ALL)

PINTU v. ZILADHIKARI DISTT. SULTANPUR AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10777/2025 · 2025-11-11

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10777 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The representation was made to the Tehsildar on 18.10.2025, however, it is argued that the same is to be decided by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, who has not been made a party to the writ petition. 3. In light of the same, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to add the Sub-Divisional Magistrate as a party- respondent in the array of the parties during the course of the day. 4. Upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, we are of the view that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Kadipur, District- Sultanpur should decide the representation of the petitioner after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the Gaon Sabha, Bhatpura Narayanpur, Tehsil- Kadipur, Sultanpur within a period of eight weeks from date in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. November 11, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajesh Kumar, Kajal Soni Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Pintu .....Petitioner(s) Ziladhikari Distt. Sultanpur And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench