G.N.JAYAPRAKASH v. State rep by the Inspector of Police
CRL OP/32710/2025 · 2025-11-28
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179832 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179832 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 G.N.Jayaprakash ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by The Inspector of Police, K-11, CMBT Police Station. (Crime No.595 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.595 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Bharath For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.10.2025, for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of 1/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 BNS in Crime No.595 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent, seeks bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused had cheated the defacto complainant and others under the pretext of giving vehicle loans and after collecting vehicle document, they inturn pledged the same for higher value and thereby swindled the money and also failed to return the money or vehicle. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ranked as A4 in this case and he is an advocate by profession and he has also rendered professional services to A5 in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the 2/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 prosecution case and submitted that the investigation is pending. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases, however, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the period of incarceration and the fact that the petitioner has rendered professional services to other accused, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions:
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned V-Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019'].
The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their 3/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses; [e] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in 4/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 28.11.2025 sma Note :
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. 5/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 To 1.The V-Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore. 2.The Inspector of Police, K-11, CMBT Police Station. 3.The Central Prison, Puzhal. 4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 6/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 7/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.32710 of 2025 28.11.2025 8/8 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis