AKSHAYRAJ SINGH @ BALLU SON OF MANOHAR SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/2695/2025 · 2025-05-26
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17980 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17980 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:22057] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2695/2025 Akshayraj Singh @ Ballu Son Of Manohar Singh, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Dhaturi, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Smt. Om Kanwar Wife Of Manohar Singh, Aged About 62 Years, Resident Of Dhaturi, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raghuraj Singh Rajawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 26/05/2025 An application is moved by the respondent No.2 with the subsequent prayer. Vide order dated 23.05.2025, it was ordered in presence of respective parties and after taking note of the vital facts of the matter in hand that the respondent No.2 be accommodated in Apna Ghar Ashram Bassi, Jaipur. Howsoever, after passing of the said order, an application is furnished by respondent No.2 stating that as she is willing to stay in a rented premise. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the respondent No.2 has refused to go to Apna Ghar and desires to live at her own. It is also submitted that an attempt of meditation is ongoing or may be initiated in more effective manner among the petitioners and respondent No.2 perhaps the outcome of the same may be positive.
[2025:RJ-JP:22057] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2695/2025] In the facts and circumstances, considering that it is an admitted case of respective sides that the respondent No.2 is approximately 55 years of age therefore, she cannot be categorized their senior citizen. In light of above, the direction passed in order dated 23.05.2025 for accommodating the respondent No.2 in Apna Ghar, Bassi, Jaipur is withdrawn. The petitioner and complainant, if they so choose, they will be free to carry out mediation. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter in hand, the order dated 27.02.2025 passed considering the provisions of the Senior Citizen Act, 2007 is quashed and set aside along with the consequential proceedings arising therefrom. Accordingly, the order dated 23.05.2025 is modified to the aforementioned extent.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-326