HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6453 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents while notice on behalf of respondent No.3- Gram Sabha has been accepted by Sri Mohan Singh. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.2 -Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to decide Revision No.RST/1767/2023, computerized case No.C-202304000001767 titled as Hari Ram and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, under Section 219 of L.R. Act, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent No.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.2 - Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya is directed to decide Revision No.RST/1767/2023, computerized case No.C- 202304000001767 titled as Hari Ram and others Vs. State of U.P. and others, under Section 219 of L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Hari Ram And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ambedkar Nagar And Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 4, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6453 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench