[2025:RJ-JP:19429] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.2705/2025 1. Kana Ram Meena S/o Shri Sujaram Meena, Resident Of Rakhlo Ki Dhani, Sumel, Looniyawas, Jaipur, Luniawas, Rajasthan 2. Chuttan Lal Mali S/o Shri Gopal Lal Mali, Resident Of 50, Maliyon Ki Dhani, Sumel, Looniyawas, Jaipur, Luniawas, Rajasthan 3. Bahadur Singh S/o Shri Harphul Singh, Resident Of 12, Ganpati Vihar, Maliyon Ki Dhani, Sumel, Jamdoli, Jaipur, Rajasthan 4. Mahindra Kumar Meena S/o Shri Kaluram Meena, Resident Of 44, Gopal Meena Ki Dhani, Sumel, Agra Road, Jamdoli, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Narsi S/o Shri Raghunath Saini, Resident Of 48, Maliyon Ki Dhani, Keshav Vidha Pith, Sumel, Looniyawas, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Bairwa, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Ravindra Singh Chauhan, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 08/05/2025 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing the FIR No.1141/2023, registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, on the basis of compromise entered between the parties vide Annexure-2. [2025:RJ-JP:19429] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2705/2025] 3. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 concedes that the petitioners and respondent No.2 have entered into compromise which bears the signature of respondent No.2-Narsi, vide Annexure-2. The dispute between the parties is inter-se and does not affect the society at large therefore, considering the above facts, if the present FIR is quashed then the complainant has no objection. 3. Heard and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the fact that the parties have agreed upon to enter into compromise and it bears the signature of the complainant and the dispute between the parties is inter-se and does not affect the society at large, this Court placing reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in 2022 (14) SCC 531, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present petition. 5. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed on the ground of compromise entered between the parties and the FIR No.1141/2023, registered at Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur City (East) with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside. 6. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-50