IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWPOA No. 1977 of 2019 Date of decision : 03.07.2025. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Megh Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & another ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Verma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Amandeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions to press relief/prayer (b) only, which reads as under:- “The respondents be directed to allow/permit the petitioner to join his duties/services and to remain in service till 5.12.2012 i.e. till attaining age of 60 years.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide prayer (b) in light of 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- judgment passed by Full Bench of this Court on 22.2.2022 in CWP No. 2711 of 2017, titled as, Baldev vs. State of H.P. & others along with connected matters. 3. The prayer being innocuous is allowed. 4. The petition is disposed of with directions to respondent No.2 to consider and decide prayer (b) of the petitioner in light of aforesaid judgment within eight weeks from the date of passing of this order by passing a detailed and reasoned order. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 3rd July, 2025 (kck)