DR. ANAND KUMAR AGARWAL v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY.MEDICAL OF HEALTH and ORS.
WRIA/6952/2021 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179773 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179773 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6952 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Sri Avinash Pandey, Advocate, holding brief of Sri M.P.Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has lost its' efficacy and has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed. In view of the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consigned to records. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 26, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gyanendra Kumar Srivastav (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Dr. Anand Kumar Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Medical Of Health And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench