HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7057 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Vijay Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Ambedkar Nagar to decide Original Suit No.362 of 2019 titled Sharfuzzama Khan v. Hariram Maurya as well as an application under Order 39 Rule 2A filed therein bearing Contempt Case No.174 of 2025 expeditiously. 3. Keeping in view the nature of relief sought and order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although an order of temporary injunction is operating in his favour, the respondent has violated the same and, therefore, he has filed an application under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC on 17.10.2025, which is still pending. 5. In case a litigant alleges violation of a temporary injunction order passed by the learned Civil Court, it is a serious matter and it needs to be looked into and should be decided expeditiously. 6. The instant petition is disposed off by issuing a direction to Civil Judge (J.D.), Ambedkar Nagar to decide Original Suit No.362 of 2019 titled Sharfuzzama Khan v. Hariram Maurya as well as an application under Order 39 Rule 2A filed therein bearing Contempt Case No.174 of 2025 expeditiously, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. December 10, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pt. S. Chandra, Ravi Kant Mishra, Vijay Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Sharfuzzama Khan .....Petitioner(s) Hariram Maurya .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench