AKHIL TRIPATHI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/10012/2024 · 2025-11-07
Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179748 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179748 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10012 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
1. Case called out.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners nor any request for adjournment or pass over has been made whereas learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
3. This petition has been filed challenging an F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.668/2024, under Sections 3(5), 115(2), 352, 351(2), 110, 288 of B.N.S. and Section 3(1)(d), 3(1)(r), 3(2)(va) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station Kotwali City, District Pratapgarh.
4. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, submits that final report bearing No.02/2025 dated 08.01.2025 has been forwarded in this matter, therefore, this petition has rendered infructuous. The said instructions are taken on record.
5. Dismissed accordingly.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 7, 2025 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amandeep Singh, Sachin Upadhyay, Swati Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Akhil Tripathi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench