Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179745 (ALL)

Ruchi Gupta v. State of U.P., THRU. PRIN. SECY., ENERGY and others

/11001/2025 · 2025-11-26

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11001 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for State and Ms. Gursimran Kaur, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Aprajita Bansal, learned counsel appearing for MVVNL. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India whereby the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent/MVVNL to provide electricity connection to the petitioner's house. We dismiss the petition with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application/appeal under the Electricity Act, 2003. November 26, 2025 Mohit Singh/- E-Court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aprajita Bansal (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ruchi Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P., Thru. Prin. Secy., Energy And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench