[2025:RJ-JP:38514] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7205/2025 Nathi Devi Nayak D/o Shri Kishan Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Behind Sikar Vidhya Pith School, Basant Vihar, Sikar Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Depart- ment Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Services, Ra- jasthan, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur 3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Agricultural Man- agement Institution Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur Ra- jasthan Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ripu Daman Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 19/09/2025 1. Though various prayers have been made in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if; she is permitted to file a representation before respondent No.2 - Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan, encapsulating the grievances raised in the present writ petition; and if a direction is issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time-bound manner. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. [2025:RJ-JP:38514] (2 of 2) [CW-7205/2025] 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2 - Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Services, Rajasthan, within a period of four (04) weeks from to- day. Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by passing a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide the representation has been issued only with a view to ensure expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed as an order to decide the representation in any particular manner. 5. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law. 6. In view of the above, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/10