Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179701 (ALL)

VISHRAM MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WPIL/1269/2025 · 2025-12-17

Arun Bhansali, Jaspreet Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1269 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of the notice dated 12.08.2024 and 23.08.2024 under Section 4 of the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. 2. Submissions have been made seeking to question the issuance of the notification and the fact that certain villagers are opposed to the same. 3. Filing of the petitions in the nature of public interest seeking to question the consolidation proceedings, having held to be not maintainable, as repeatedly held by this Court recently in Chin Guddu v. State of U.P. and Others: 2025: AHC-LKO: 15776DB wherein this Court took note of the earlier decision in M/s Runup Gramodyog Evam Seva Sansthan v. State of U.P. (2022) 155 RD 497. 4. Reference may also be made to Vishvadev Vs. Director of Consolidation and 4 others : Writ - C No. 54560 of 2016, decided on 19.11.2016 and Dharmpal Singh and 7 others Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others : PIL No. 3799 of 2025, decided on 10.12.2025. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Singh, Rahul Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Nishant Shukla (S.C.) Vishram Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. thru. its Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. and 6 others .....Respondent(s) 5. In view thereof, the petition has no substance, the same is, therefore, dismissed. December 17, 2025 Mukesh Pal/Asheesh WPIL No. 1269 of 2025 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench