Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179700 (ALL)

RAMU VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/10088/2025 · 2025-10-30

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10088 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. Heard Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for he petitioner, learned Standing counsel for State- respondent No.s 1, 2 and 3 and Sri Pankaj Gupta on behalf of respondent No.4. 1. By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged undated notice, as contained in Annexure No.1, which has been passed in compliance of the order dated 2.7.2024 passed by Assistant Collector/Tehsildar, Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh in exercise of the powers under Section 67 of U.P.Revenue Code where he has held that the petitioner has illegally encroached upon gaon sabha land of gata No.210/0.082 hectare situated in Village Kohrav, Pargana and Tehsil Patti, District Pratapgarh. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that an application for recall of the order dated 2.7.2024 was preferred by the petitioner which is pending consideration. 3. Considering the aforesaid and especially the fact that an application or recall is pending, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievances of the petitioner shall stand substantially redressed in case opposite party No.3 is directed to consider and decide the recall application with expedition. 4. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey, Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Ramu Vishwakarma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Learned Standing counsel does not oppose the innocuous prayer made by the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with a direction to opposite party No.3 to consider and decide petitioner's application for recall with expedition, say within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is placed before him, in accordance with law. 6. The parties shall cooperate in the proceedings and shall not seek unnecessary adjournment. 7. October 30, 2025 RKM. WRIC No. 10088 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench