Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1797 (CHH)

MAHESH KUMAR THADANI @ JUNAID KHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/59/2022 · 2025-07-14

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:32882-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 59 of 2022 Mahesh Kumar Thadani @ Junaid Khan S/o Jayram Das Thadani Aged About 36 Years R/o Ashok Nagar, Sarkanda, Birkona Raod, Near Pani Tanki, Police Station- Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ( As Per Chargesheet) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Khamtarai, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Pushpendra Tiwari S/o Khamhan Tiwari Aged About 27 Years R/o Amora, Navagarh, Janjgir-Champa, District-Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Shubhank Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent No.1/State For Respondent No.2 : : Mr.S.S.Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Mr.Bharat Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 15.07.2025 1. Heard Mr.Shubhank Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.07.15 18:32:59 +0530 2 heard Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for respondent No.1/State and Mr.Bharat Sharma, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2. 2. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court be kind enough to allow this petition and quash and set aside entire proceedings under Section 420, 34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Khamtarai, District Raipur (C.G.), F.I.R. bearing No.499/2021, vide Criminal Case Case No.10526/2021 so far as petitioner is concerned [State of C.G. vs. Sagar Bisai] pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur, District Raipur, in the interest of justice and be pleased to discharge the petitioner.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case, charges have been framed and the trial is in progress, as such he wants to withdraw this petition with a request to direct the trial Court to expedite the trial. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Bablu