SUDHIR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8401/2025 · 2025-10-30
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179693 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8401 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3 and Sri Manoj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4.
2. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 6.8.2025 bearing FIR no. 0347 of 2025 under Sections 409, 420 and 506 of IPC, lodged at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. Further prayer is for a mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 1 to 3 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that although the FIR has been lodged against petitioner-Sri Sudhir Singh and Sri Ashok Tyagi yet the petitioner has no concerned now with Sri Ashok Tyagi.
4. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioner and respondent no.4 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 26.8.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-2 to the petition.
4. This Court vide order dated 16.09.2025 had required the compromise deed to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhinav Nath Tripathi, Amrendra Nath Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Ashish Chaurasia, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Shubham Chaurasiya, Vijay Nandan Mani Tripathi Sudhir Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 16.09.2025 the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 23.09.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioner and respondent no.4.
6. As per the said compromise, the petitioner and respondent no.4 have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably.
7. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings of first information report dated 6.8.2025 bearing FIR no. 0347 of 2025 under Sections 409, 420 and 506 of IPC, lodged at Police Station Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow, are quashed. October 30, 2025 AKK CRLP No. 8401 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench