Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179684 (ALL)

ARUN KUMAR KASODHAN ALIAS RAHUL ALIAS ARUN GUPTA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/2130/2024 · 2025-10-31

Rajnish Kumar, Zafeer Ahmad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2130 of 2024 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None for the petitioners. 3. This Court passed the following order on 22.3.2024: "This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the First Information Report dated 22.02.2024, bearing Case Crime No.0004 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, 1961, Police Station - Mahila Thana, District - Ayodhya. Learned counsel for the contesting parties are agreeable for mediation, as the genesis of the F.I.R. is a matrimonial dispute and the entire family has been roped in including the husband. Petitioner No.1 and opposite party No.4- wife shall appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court on 8th April, 2024. Petitioners counsel has instructions to inform the court that the petitioners are ready to deposit Rs.25,000/- within ten days with the Mediation and Conciliation Center of this Court. As soon as the opposite party No.4 appears before the Mediator, on the first date, an amount of Rs.15,000/- shall be released in her favour and the remaining amount shall be paid to her at the end of mediation proceedings, if she co-operates in mediation. Subject to the aforesaid deposit, it is provide that till the next date of listing the petitioners shall not be arrested in pursuance of the impugned First Information Report dated 22.02.2024, bearing Case Crime No.0004 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, 1961, Police Station - Mahila Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Kumar Yadav, Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Rakesh Kumar Singh Arun Kumar Kasodhan Alias Rahul Alias Arun Gupta And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Civil Sectt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Thana, District - Ayodhya, to facilitate the aforesaid exercise. Mediators shall conduct the proceedings and submit the report. List this case in third week of May, 2024, showing name of Shri Rakesh Kumar Singh, as counsel for the opposite parties in the cause list. It is made clear that if the petitioners do not deposit the aforesaid amount, benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioners." 4. As per the office report and the report of mediation, mediation has completed but it has failed. 5. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 27.10.2025 received from Ms. Chetna Pandey, SI, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Ayodhya, a copy of which has been produced before this Court and is placed on record, submits that charge sheet no. 32/2004 dated 3.10.2024 has been filed in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) FTC (Crime Against Women), Ayodhya on 23.10.2024, therefore, this petition has lost its efficacy. 6. Dismissed accordingly. October 31, 2025 Fahim/- CRLP No. 2130 of 2024 2 (Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD FAHIM AKHTAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench