Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17968 (HP)

PRANAV THAKUR v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/11058/2024 · 2025-09-15

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.11058 of 2024 Decided on: 15.09.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pranav Thakur ………..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. ……..Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge This writ petition has been filed for the grant of the following substantive prayer:- “(1) That impugned order Annexure P- may kindly be quashed and set-aside, being illegal, arbitrary and unwarranted in the eyes of law. (2) That respondents may kindly be directed to revise the pay of the petitioner in terms of notification dated 06.09.2022, by considering 31.12.2021 as a date of appointment on regular basis, alongwith arrears and all consequential relief.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner, the issue raised by him and the reliefs claimed in this writ petition have already been adjudicated upon in Mohit Sharma & Anr. vs. State of H.P. and Ors.2. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? 2CWP No.1638 of 2024 decided on 29.11.2024 2 3. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter and notwithstanding the office order (Annexure P-5), the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the case of the petitioner, afresh for grant of reliefs claimed for by him in accordance with law and as well as taking into consideration the above judgment in case of Mohit Sharma2, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 15, 2025 Judge Ankit