M/s Royal Mindz Estates Pvt. Ltd., v. State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/13015/2025 · 2025-08-17
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17968 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17968 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010248212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) A. i**' Vi, c h~ MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13ni.«; OF 7n?i; i Between: M/s Royal Mindz Estates Pvt. Ltd., Having its Regd. office at Flat No House No. 8-2-467/1, Jhaveri's Sanghi Residency, Road No. 5, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500034. Rep. by its Managing Director . 402, ...Petitioner AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary. Revenue (Lands) Dept., A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi-522 503. 2. The Chief Commissioner of Land and Administration Special Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh 3rd Floor, APIIC Towers, Plot No.1, Mangalari, Guntur District- 522 503. 3. The District Collector and Magistrate, Collectorate, Collector Office, Main Rd, Krishnagar, Krishna Nagar, Maharani Peta, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh - 530002. (CCLA) and A.P. 1st and
4. The Joint Collector, MRO Office, Anandapuram District, Visakhapatnam Plot No. 7-5-28, Near Panduranga Swamy Temple Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Rd, - 530003. 5. The Tahsildar, Ananda Puram Mandal Anandapuram, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh, India - 530052. 6. Chikkala Ravi Naidu, S/o late Chikkala Naidu, Aged 50 years, Hindu, business, resident of D.No. 44-39-16, Nandagiri Nagar, Near 80 feet road, Akkayapalem, Visakhapatnam. 7. Smt Chikkala Satyavathi, W/o late Chikkala Naidu, Aged 72 years, Hindu, household duties, resident of D.No. 44-39-16, Nandagiri Nagar, Near 80 feet road, Akkayapalem, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd Respondent in implementing G.O.Ms.No. 607 Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023 for exchange of Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) in lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village to the layout the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and Respondents to allot of Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) In lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs.
0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 607 Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023. of consequently direct the formation of approach lA NO: 1 OF 202fi Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'^'^ respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner representations dated 02.04.2025, 05.10.2024, and 21.06.2024 to implement G.O.Ms. No. 607 Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023 for exchange of
Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) in lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMU RANCHUMARTHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 & 7: — The Court made the following order:
i APHC010248212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO [3330] WRIT PETITION NO: 13015/2025 Between: 1.M/S ROYAL MINDZ ESTATES PVT, LTD., HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT FLAT NO. 402, HOUSE NO. 8-2-467/1, JHAVERI'S SANGHI RESIDENCY, ROAD NO. 5, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD - 500034. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL SECRETARY REVENUE (LANDS) DEPT., A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI- 522 503. 2.THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND AND ADMINISTRATION CCLA AND SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TOWERS, PLOT NO.L, MANGALARI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 A.P. 1ST AND 3RD FLOOR, APIIC
503. MAGISTRATE, MAIN RD, MAHARANI PETA, 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND COLLECTORATE, COLLECTOR OFFICE, KRISHNAGAR, KRISHNA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH - 530002.
4.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, MRO OFFICE ANANDAPURAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, PLOT NO. PANDURANGA SWAMY TEMPLE RD, PANDURANGAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH - 530003. 5 THE TAHSILDAR, ANANDA PURAM MANDAL ANANDAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA - 7-5-28, NEAR
530052. 6 CHIKKALA RAVI NAIDU, S/O LATE CHIKKALA NAIDU, AGED 50 YEARS, HINDU, BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF D.NO. 44-39-16, NANDAGIRI NAGAR, NEAR 80 FEET ROAD, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7.SMT CHIKKALA SATYAVATHI. W/O LATE CHIKKALA NAIDU, AGED 72 YEARS, HINDU, HOUSEHOLD DUTIES, RES IDENT OF D.NO. 44-39-16, NANDAGIRI NAGAR, NEAR 80 FEET ROAD, AKKAYAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S)
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3'" Respondent in implementing G.O.Ms.No.607, Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023 for exchange of Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) in lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village to the layout of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents to allot of Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) In lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 607 Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ,
Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3rd Respondent in implementing G.O.Ms.No.607, Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023 for exchange of Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) in lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village to the layout of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents to allot of Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) In lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 607 Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.RAMU PANCHUMARTHI in Anandapuram Mandal Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 13015 of 2025
ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“...to issue an appropriate Writ,
Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the 3"^ Respondent in Implementing G.O.Ms.No.607, Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023 for exchange of Government land In Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs.0.309Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) in lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs.0.309Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout in Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village to the layout of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the Respondents to allot of Government land in Sy.No.9p measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts classified as Pachikabayalu (Grazing land) In lieu of Patta land in Sy.No.4 measuring an extent of Acs. 0.309 Cts of Tarluwada Village of Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District for formation of approach road to the layout In Sy.No.4 of Tarluwada Village in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 607 Revenue (Lands. I), dated 22.12.2023 and to pass such other further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. ” Pithily this writ petition is filed on the ground that a representation was made to the authorities, but it was not addressed. Therefore, it is urged that the respondents be directed to address the representation, as such direction would suffice in the circumstances of the case. 2. In the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in The Government of India vs P. Venkatesh reported in (2019) 15 SCC 613 held that;
3. Dispose of the representation’ mantra is increasingly permeating the judicial process in the High Courts and the Tribunals. Such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not service to the cause of justice. The litigant is back again before the Court, as this case shows, having incurred attendant costs and suffered delays of the legal process. This would have been obviated by calling for a counter in the first instance, thereby resulting in finality to the dispute. 4.
This Court is not oblivious of the fact that a Court to authorities, before directing "consideration" of a claim or representation should examine whether the claim or representation is with reference to a
"live" issue or whether it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue If it is with reference to a "dead" or "stale" issue or dispute, the Court/tribunal should put an end to the matter and should not direct
consideration or reconsideration. If the Court to tribunal deciding direct "consideration" without itself examining the merits, it should make it clear that such consideration will be without prejudice to contention relating to limitation or delay and laches. Even if the Court does not expressly say so, that would be the legal position and effect." to any
5. Disposal of proceedings by seemingly directing consideration of representation though result in quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions but such orders do more disservice than service to the cause of justice. However the respondents are directed that the petitioner's representations dated 02.04.2025, 05.10.2024 and 21.06.2024 innocuous orders
6. must
3 /*■ be considered by the respondents, examined thoroughly, issue orders accordingly, keeping in view of the G.O.Ms.No.607. Revenue (Lands.I), dated 22.12.2023, and communicate the decision given to the petitioner. It goes without saying that the entire process will be completed within six weeks from the date of the order is received. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
7. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any shall stand closed.
Sd/- H. r^AGAIVSP/.A assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue (Lands) Dept., A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi-522 503.
2. The Chief Commissioner of Land and Administration (CCLA) and Special Chief Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh A.P. 1st and 3rd Floor, APIIC Towers, Plot No.1, Mangalari, Guntur District-522 503.
3. The District Collector and Magistrate, Collectorate, Collector Office, Main Rd, Krishnagar, Krishna Nagar, Maharani Peta, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh - 530002.
4. The Joint Collector, MRO Office Anandapuram, Visakhapatnam District, Plot No. 7-5-28, Near Panduranga Swamy Temple Rd, Pandurangapuram, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh - 530003.
5. The Tahsildar, Ananda Puram Mandal Anandapuram, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh, India - 530052.
6. One CC to Sri Ramu Panchumarthi, Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT]
8. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATED:18/08/2025
ORDER WP NO. 13015 OF 2025 g( 1 1 SEP 2025 rrentSectioo^^ I 50 DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS