JHINKU v. COMMISSIONER FAIZABAD REGION FAIZABAD AND OTHERS
WRIC/1004925/2006 · 2025-11-27
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179673 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179673 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1004925 of 2006 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J. I.A. No.3 of 2023
1. This is an application for abatement
2. Learned counsel for the respondent nos 4 to 8 has filed abatement application due to non-filing of the substitution application of petitioner, opposite party no.4 and opposite party no.5.
3. In view of the above, this application is allowed. On Writ Petition: In view of the order passed today on I.A. No.3 of 2023, this writ petition is dismissed as abated.
November 27, 2025 GK Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Kumar Singh Raj Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., M.A. Siddiqui, R.N.Gupta, Raj Kumar Pandey (Irshad Ali,J.) Jhinku .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner Faizabad Region Faizabad And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM KUMAR SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench