ANURAG CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.BASIC EDU.CIVIL SECTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/26083/2016 · 2025-12-15
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179672 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179672 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 26083 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Shri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3 and learned counsel for the State are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to record. December 15, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Neeraj Chaurasiya, Ramesh Pandey, Ravi Shankar Tiwari, Vinay Prakash Tiwari (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Anurag Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Basic Edu.Civil Sectt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench