- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5450 WP No. 47929 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 47929 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: M/S. SPARDHA MITHRA HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.3441, BEHIND METRO STATION, SERVICE ROAD, RPC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040. REP. BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY, MR. OMKAR PATEL, S/O LATE SIDDARAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KESHAVA MURTHY.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, M.S. BUILDDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560 001. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECREARY, 5TH FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560 001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, 5TH FLOOR, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5450 WP No. 47929 of 2017 BANGALORE-560 001. 4. THE JOINT DIRECTOR (NT/SNT), BACKWARD CLASSES WELARE DEPARTMENT, NO.16, D.DEVARAJ URS BHAVAN, 3RD FLOOR, MILLER TANKBED AREA, VASANTHA NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 052. 5. M/S UNIVERSAL COACHING CENTER, NO.2922/20, CHORD ROAD, RPC LAYOUT, NEAR ATTIGUPPE BUS SAND, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040. REP. BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1 TO 4; R5-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Keshava Murthy.B., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that a memo has been filed stating that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5450 WP No. 47929 of 2017 placed on record and the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3