Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179638 (ALL)

RAM RATAN SINGH v. SRI RAKESH KUMAR MISHRA, MILK COMMISSIONER DAIRY DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND ANOTHER

CAPL/3308/2025 · 2025-12-03

Manish Kumar

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3308 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Shri Shanker Lal has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2 which is taken on record. Shri Shanker Lal learned counsel for respondent no.2 has submitted that the judgment and order dated 05.5.2025 passed in the writ petition has been complied with and in support of his submissions he relied on the order dated 26.11.2025 and a photocopy of the same has been provided during the course of argument which is taken on record and the photocopy has been provided to the learned counsel for the applicant. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the judgment and order passed by Writ Court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous but liberty may be given to the applicant if he is still aggrieved he may challenge the order dated 26.11.2025 by filing a writ petition. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. It is always open for the applicant to avail remedy as may be permissible under law, if he is still aggrieved. Notice, if any, is hereby discharged. December 3, 2025 mks Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajendra Prasad, Rana Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shanker Lal (Manish Kumar,J.) Ram Ratan Singh .....Applicant(s) Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Milk Commissioner Dairy Development Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MANISH SAXENA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench