Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179635 (ALL)

JAGDISH PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ PRIN. SECY., P.W.D. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/12753/2025 · 2025-11-03

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12753 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Although petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to regularize petitioner on the post of Mate in light of the Regularization Rules 2016 and for revision of salary, pension and gratuity along with other benefits but learned counsel for petitioner submits that there was an error in drafting of petition and he restricts his prayer in the petition only for a direction to concerned authority to consider grant of salary to petitioner which has been withheld since February 2025. 3. In view of revised prayer of learned counsel for petitioner, liberty is granted to him to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.3 i.e. Executive Engineer, Regional Block, Public Works Department, Sultanpur, District Sultanpur. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. The petition stands disposed of. November 3, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ali Moid, Aviral Raj Singh, Mohd. Yasir Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Jagdish Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy., P.W.D. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench