Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179634 (ALL)

HARI PRASAD MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/6405/2025 · 2025-11-03

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6405 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.2- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Colonel Ganj, Gonda to decide case No.13079 of 2021, computerized case No.T202108300513079 "Leelawati and others Vs. State" under Section 134, of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Colonel Ganj, Gonda is desired to make all endeavor to decide case No.13079 of 2021, computerized case No.T202108300513079 "Leelawati and others Vs. State" under Section 134, of U.P. Revenue Code, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharmendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Hari Prasad Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. November 3, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 6405 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench