Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179622 (ALL)

ROKI SOLANKI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/10590/2025 · 2025-10-31

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10590 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Shri Apoorv Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State as well as Shri Vineet Kumar Yadav, Advocate who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the informant is taken on record. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.172 of 2025 under Sections 87, 3(5), 310(2), 127(3), 70(1), 143(2) BNS, P.S.- Harpalpur, District- Hardoi. 3. It is argued that two co-accused persons, namely, Vinod Kumar Singh and Sachin Kushwaha, have been granted bail by means of orders dated 05.08.2025 and 28.08.2025 passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 6864 of 2025 and 8004 of 2025. respectively. Therefore, the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the ground of parity coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 24.09.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Roki Solanki be released on bail in aforesaid Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Apoorv Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Roki Solanki .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. . October 31, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 10590 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench