Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:31247 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.954 of 2025
Date of decision: 11.09.2025 Ranjeet Singh.
...Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr.
..Respondents.
Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Desh Raj Thakur, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta and Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocates General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record copy of office instructions dated 20.08.2025 from the Directorate of Technical Education, Vocational & Industrial Training, Himachal Pradesh in terms whereof representation of the petitioner has been decided under
Order dated 19.08.2025. Copy of order dated 19.08.2025 has also been appended with the office instructions.
2.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that benefits to the petitioner as per aforesaid office order shall be released within a period of six weeks.
2025:HHC:31247 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
In view of above, the present execution petition is
disposed of by directing the respondents to release the consequential benefits in favour of the petitioner in terms of
consideration order dated 19.08.2025 within six weeks from today. The petitioner shall, however, be at liberty to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievance, if any, in accordance with law.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua 11th September, 2025
Judge (rupsi)