ARYAN RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/12149/2025 · 2025-12-04
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179610 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179610 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12149 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and and Sri Manish Kumar Gupta, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.377 of 2025, under Sections 351(3), 65(1) of BNS and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Bhadokhar, District Raebareli. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegations were levelled that the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was being chased by the applicant and was being harassed and also forcing her to marry with him and on 05.09.2025 at about 11:00 (night), he forced the daughter of the informant to run away and also misbehaved with her. No allegation of rape was levelled. In the statement under Section 180 of BNSS, the victim alleged that on 05.09.2025, the rape was also committed. In the statement under Section 183 of BNSS, the victim stated that on the date of the incident, the family members were also at home and were sleeping at about 11:00 (night) when the applicant came and formed physical relation with her. The medical report on record does not corroborate any allegation. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the age of the victim and the inherent improbability in the statement under Section 183 and variance with the FIR version and the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bisunbablu Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aryan Rawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 05.11.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Aryan Rawat be released on bail in the aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 4, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 12149 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench