Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179589 (ALL)

SUDHA GAUTAM v. SRI MALKHAN SINGH, CHAIRPERSON STANDING COMMITTEE UNDER U.P. WITNESS PROTECTION SCHEME LKO.

CAPL/3464/2025 · 2025-10-31

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3464 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that inadvertently, certain facts and documents are left to be mentioned/enclosed along with the present contempt application which are necessary for proper adjudication of the present contempt application and prays for withdrawal of the same as dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. As prayed, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh. Office is directed to return the original copy of the relevant documents, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining photocopy of the same. October 31, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sajjad Husain, Kulsoom Firoz Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Manish Kumar,J.) Sudha Gautam .....Applicant(s) Sri Malkhan Singh, Chairperson Standing Committee Under U.P. Witness Protection Scheme Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench