Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179586 (ALL)

MAJOR DR.YASH SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/10463/2025 · 2025-12-15

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10463 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Vinod Kumar Pandey, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 3. This application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash the order dated 02.08.2023 annexed as Annexure No. 1 to this petition arising out of Complaint Case No. 24283 of 2023 Police Station Gazipur, District- Lucknow, on the basis of Compromise Agreement dated 24.09.2024, annexed as Annexure No. 5 to the application, so far as the same relates to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 5 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Kumar Saxena, Amit Kumar Tiwari, Jayaditya Rai, Rishi Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Major Dr.Yash Shrivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action in pursuance to the order dated 02.08.2023, in Complaint Case No. 24283 of 2023 Police Station Gazipur, District- Lucknow, shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 15, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 10463 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench