HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14166 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties 1 and 2 and Mr. Utsav Mishra learned counsel for opposite party No.3. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the concerned authority to declare the petitioner successful on the post of Mukha Sevika in terms of advertisement No. 5/Pariksha/2022. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that although petitioner had applied under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category for the said post but at the time of physical verification of documentation, she was not afforded an opportunity to provide the aforesaid documents resulting in her disqualification. 4. Learned counsel for opposite party No.3 on the basis of instructions has refuted submissions advanced by learned counsel for petitioner with submission that although petitioner had applied under the EWS quota but with regard to documentation had indicated that the same was not applicable. It is further submitted that subsequently the petitioner herself indicated that she inadvertently applied under the EWS quota. A written note with regard to the same dated 28th January 2025 at the time of physical verification of documents has also been indicated. It is further submitted upon instructions that in the mean time the recruitment process has been completed and another person has already been appointed for the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Utsav Mishra Ayushi Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Bal Vikas Seva And Pushthar Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) said post. 5. The aforesaid two documents such as the application form of petitioner and document verification report dated 28th January 2025 are taken on record. 6. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for parties and perusal of material on record, particularly those furnished by learned counsel for opposite party No.3, it is evident that although petitioner had applied under Economically Weaker Section quota but had not indicated any documentation to substantiate the same. Therefore it was in such circumstances that her candidature under Economically Weaker Category was rejected. 7. Upon examination of documentation produced by learned counsel for opposite party No.3, it is thus evident that although petitioner had applied under the EWS quota but failed to substantiate the same by documentation at the time of document verification. 8. In such circumstances, this court does not find any occasion to grant indulgence. 9. The petition therefore fails and is dismissed at the admission stage itself. Parties to bear their own costs. December 15, 2025 prabhat WRIA No. 14166 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench