- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6450 WP No. 10282 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.10282 OF 2014 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI K.V. RAMA REDDY S/O. LATE SRI VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS FORMERLY WORKING AS ASSISTANT GR.II, NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD., UAS CAMPUS, HEBBAL BANGALORE AND RESIDING AT NO.68, PANTHARAPALYA NAYANDAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE 1a) RATHNAMMA W/O LATE K.V. RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS 1b) R. PRATAP REDDY S/O. LATE K.V. RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS 1c) R. NAGENDRA REDDY S/O. LATE K.V. RAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT C/O. ANASUYA NO.16, 13TH CROSS, BANDE COLONY GEDDALAHALLI, BANGALORE - 94 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUBRAMANYA BHAT M., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6450 WP No. 10282 of 2014 AND: 1. THE NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD., (A GOVERNMENT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING) REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR BEEJA BHAVAN, PUSA COMPLEX NEW DELHI - 110 012 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR & THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD., BEEJA BHAVAN, PUSA COMPLEX NEW DELHI - 110 012 3. THE ASSISTANT MANAGER (ADMINISTRATION) NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD., BEEJA BHAVAN, PUSA COMPLEX NEW DELHI - 110 012 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHARAN RAJ N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. JAGADEESH MUNDARAGI, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS PERTAINING TO FACTS OF THE CASE. DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PAY ALL THE MONETARY BENEFITS NAMELY ARREARS OF SALARY, INCREMENTS, ETC., AS IF HE HAS CONTINUED IN EMPLOYMENT TILL HE ATTAINED THE AGE OF SUPERANNUATION AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6450 WP No. 10282 of 2014 ORAL ORDER Heard Sri. M.Subramanya Bhat, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel Sri. Charan Raj.N. for Sri.Jagadeesh Mundaragi, learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the writ petition papers. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a mandamus to direct the respondents to pay all the monetary benefits namely arrears of salary, increments, etc., along with interest as he has continued in employment till he attained the age of superannuation. But learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the mandamus was sought on the basis of order passed by this Court dated 20.06.2012 in W.P.No.14522/2008 and the said order is reversed in W.A.No.8281/2012 dated 28.05.2024 which is placed on record by the respondents along with memo dated 12.07.2024. In view of the judgment in W.A.No.8281/2012, the prayer of the petitioners would no more survive for consideration. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:6450 WP No. 10282 of 2014 3. Learned counsel for the respondents also would submit that the Division Bench of this Court under its judgment dated 28.05.2024 allowed the writ appeal and set aside the order of the learned Single Judge. 4. In view of the order of the Division Bench passed in W.A.No.8281/2012 dated 28.05.2024, the petitioners would not be entitled for mandamus as sought. With the above, writ petition stands rejected. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3