DR. BHARTI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/14670/2025 · 2025-12-17
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179530 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179530 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14670 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Since the matter is being decided at the admission stage, notice to opposite party no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. Heard Ms. Meenakshi Parihar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, larned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 to 4 and perused the record. Present writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs:-
"1. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Party No. 2 to pass appropriate order for payment of salary w.e.f. 5.09.2020 to 31.03.2022 along with interest @12% per annum from the date when it had become due and ensure its payment within time bound manner. II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus. commanding the Opposite Party No. 2to pass appropriate order for revision of pension calculating the aforesaid payment and service upto the date of retirement i.e. 31.03.2022 within time bound manner." Contention put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the payment of salary w.e.f. 05-09-2020 to 31-03-2022 alongwith payable interest has not been ensured to the petitioner and the petitioner has made representation on 20-01-2025 before the opposite party no. 2, which is still pending consideration. She also submitted that benefit of revised pension has also not been provided Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Meenakshi Singh Parihar, Prashant Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Dr. Bharti Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
to the petitioner as the petitioner has already attained the age of superannuation on 31-03-2017. She submitted that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the opposite party no. 2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20-01- 2025 within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the opposite party no.
2 i.e. Director of Secondary Education U.P., Lucknow is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 20-01-2025 within the period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. December 17, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14670 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench