ROOP CHANDRA @ CHANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECT. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10883/2024 · 2025-11-03
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179517 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10883 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA, Sri Dharmendra Kumar, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.349 of 2024, under Sections 75, 333, 351(2), 64(1) of BNS, 2023 & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Tikait Nagar, District Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that when the daughter of the informant aged about 17 years was alone in her house the accused came there and took her away and when the neighbour intervened, he ran away. No allegation of rape was levelled. However, in the statement under Section 180 BNSS, first time allegation of rape was levelled, before the medical authorities, the victim stated that around 10 to 15 days ago' also, the rape was committed. The medical report does not corroborate with the allegation of rape. The applicant is aged about 22 years. 4. Learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the informant have strongly opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the nature of allegation, medical on record, the tentative Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suresh Kumar Yadav, Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Anil Kumar Nishad, Anoop Verma, Karunesh Singh, Manvendra Singh, Vijay Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Arun Kumar Mishra Roop Chandra @ Chandey .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sect. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
age of victim coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 06.08.2024 and has no criminal antecedent, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. The application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Roop Chandra @ Chandey be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on her furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 3, 2025 Renu/- BAIL No. 10883 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench