HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10271 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the representations dated 21.08.2025, 06.09.2025 filed by the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that raising their grievances the petitioners have filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however, the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No. 3 i.e. District Magistrate, Amethi should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representations of the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the respondent No. 3 - District Magistrate, Amethi is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representations of the petitioners in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from date after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and private respondents. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Pratap Singh, Anju Tripathi, Ashutosh Tiwari, Shailesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anara Devi And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. We make it clear that if there is any order passed in favour of the petitioners, the same should be complied with by the police authorities. 7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 30, 2025 Anupam S/- WRIC No. 10271 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench