Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17950 (GAU)

SANARAUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/2033/2025 · 2025-09-17

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010186372025 2025:GAU-AS:12881 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2033/2025 SANARAUL ISLAM S/O ABU B AKKER SK. @ BOKKAR ALI R/O VILL HARIPUR,P.S. PHULBARI, DIST. WEST GARO HILLS, MEGHALAYA, PIN-794104. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. RASHIDUL ISLAM, MR A K DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 18.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. R. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also Page No.# 2/3 heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Vide order dated 26.08.2025, the petitioner was granted interim bail with a direction to appear before the learned Court below [Additional CJM, South Salmara on 10.09.2025] and it is submitted that accordingly, he appeared and received orders from the learned court below with regard to the interim protection. 3. Certified copy of the order passed by the learned court in PRC Case No.20/2019 on 10.09.2025 is submitted for perusal of the Court. 4. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused petitioner claims to be a CICL. However, at the time of his appearance before the learned court below on 10.09.2025, this aspect did not set reflected in the order. 5. The scanned TCR was called for; however the same is not received. In the circumstances, considering the compliance with the bail condition by the accused petitioner, I am of the considered view that matter can be disposed of instead of keeping it pending. 6. Accordingly, interim pre-arrest bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 26.08.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions : i) That the petitioner shall available during the trial ; ii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. Page No.# 3/3 7. The petitioner is at liberty to raise plea of juvenility, if so advised. 8. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant