NAWAL BAJPAI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/12116/2024 · 2025-10-29
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179492 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12116 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the record. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.393 of 2024, under Sections 323, 363, 366, 342, 376 and 427 IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S.- Madiyaon, District- Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 14 years had left home without the informant. Subsequently, in the statement of victim recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., she stated that she had gone to Haridwar and thereafter to Delhi and stayed there for a month where physical relations were made between her and applicant. The victim, before the medical authorities, also admitted that she had gone to Hardiwar and then to Delhi and stayed there with the applicant where physical relations were formed between them. She further admitted that she stayed in Delhi for about two months. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the statement of victim, in which, she admitted that she had gone to Haridwar and to Delhi and stayed there for two months coupled with the fact that the applicant is in jail since 14.09.2024 having no criminal history, he is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vineet Kumar Chaurasia, Ram Naresh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nawal Bajpai .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Nawal Bajpai be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 29, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 12116 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench