HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9560 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court be pleased to allow the applicant to submit a personal bond and two sureties in all the cases (mentioned in para 6 of the memo of petition). 3. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in all ten cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- (i) Session trial No. 1628 of 2024, Case Crime No. 21 of 2023, U/s 380, 411, 457, 413 I.P.C., Police Station Gomti Nagar Extension, District Lucknow, bail granted before the session court on 28.10.2025. (ii) Session trial No. 1629 of 2024, Case Crime No. 115 of 2023, U/s 380, 457, 411, 413 I.P.C., Police Station Gomti Nagar Extension, District Lucknow, bail granted before the session court on 28.10.2025. (iii) Session trial No. 1637 of 2024, Case Crime No. 134 of 2023, U/s 380, 457, 411, 413 I.P.C., Police Station Gomti Nagar Extension, District Lucknow, bail granted before the session court on 28.10.2025. 4. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail, the applicant is still in jail and the applicant being poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jitendra Kushwaha, Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Om Prakash Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 13, 2025 Manoj A482 No. 9560 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench