IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1068 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.09.2025 _______________________________________________________ Naresh Kumar Sharma …….Petitioner Versus HRTC & Anr. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 09.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Dy. Divisional Manager, HRTC, Una, addressed to Financial Advisor & Chief Accountant Officer, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Shimla, Mr. Raman Jamalta, learned counsel representing the respondents, states that sum of Rs.13,70,754/- stands paid to the petitioner, on account of DCRG, whereas sum of Rs.8,30,760/-, on account of leave encashment, is yet to be paid. He further states that amount, if any, on account of interest on delay payment of leave encashment is yet to 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 be calculated and total amount, in any eventuality, shall be paid expeditiously. 2. Having taken note of the fact that amount, on account of DCRG, stands paid to the petitioner and undertaking has been given by the learned counsel representing the respondents to release the remaining sum on account of leave encashment, there appears to be no reason to keep the present petition alive, but having taken note of fact that marriage of daughter of the petitioner is scheduled to be held on 26.09.2025, this Court, while denying the prayer made on behalf of the respondents to grant two months’ time, disposes of the present petition with a direction to the respondents to pay the remaining sum alongwith interest on delayed payment, if any, within ten days failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 12, 2025 (sunil)