HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4948 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Rejoinder affidavit, filed today in Court, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the accused persons. Consequent to submission of filing report, petitioner has already preferred a protest petition before the competent court, which is pending disposal. 4. Learned AGA could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. In view of the statement made, the instant writ petition is finally disposed of with the direction that the competent court shall pass an appropriate order on the protest petition in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. November 17, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sushil Kumar Singh, Ayush Singh, Ramesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Vijay Bahadur Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench