VIKRAM PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU CHIEF SECY.STATE GOVT. CIVIL SECTT.andORS.
WRIA/16676/2016 · 2025-11-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179461 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 16676 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Nirankar Nath Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Vikram Prasad Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Chief Secy.State Govt. Civil Sectt.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench