Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 179441 (ALL)

SURAJ KUMAR @ SURAJ KUMAR RAJPOOT AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/9828/2025 · 2025-10-30

Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9828 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J. HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Ms. Meera Tripathi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State. 2.At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that during pendency of this writ petition the petitioners have been arrested, therefore, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Hence, the same may be dismissed as such. 3.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed being infructuous. Consigned to record. 4.However, it is always open for the petitioners to file their bail application before the Competent Court of law and if such application is filed by the petitioners, the same may be heard and disposed of strictly in accordance with law with expedition without giving any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. October 30, 2025 Suresh/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Verma, Annapurna Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Kumar Rajpoot And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench