HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6432 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No.1- i.e. Chief Revenue Officer, District Pratapgarh to decide/ dispose off the restoration application dated 28.07.2022 against the order dated 10.02.2016 passed by opposite party no.1 in suit bearing Computerized Case No. 2016025700190 " Liyakat Ali Vs. Shabbir Ahmad and others" under Section 28 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, pending before him, expeditiously within a period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 - Chief Revenue Officer, District Pratapgarh is desired to make all endeavor to decide/ dispose off the restoration application dated 28.07.2022 against the order dated 10.02.2016 passed by opposite party no.1, in suit bearing Computerized Case No. 2016025700190 " Liyakat Ali Vs. Shabbir Ahmad and others" under Section 28 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act,, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Ojha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Imamuddin .....Petitioner(s) Chief Revenue Officer, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . November 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 6432 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench