RAKESH MAURYA AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF PANCHAYATI RAJ AND 6 OTHERS
WPIL/1172/2025 · 2025-11-17
Arun Bhansali, Jaspreet Singh
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179424 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179424 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1172 of 2025 Chief Justice's Court HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. This petition, purportedly in public interest, has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the proposal dated 19.06.2022, whereby the land pertaining to Gata No. 867 of Gram Panchayat Bayarigaon situated in its hamlet Jhanjhana Khera was selected for construction of Sub Primary Health Centre.
2. The plea raised by the 9 petitioners is that the signature on the proposal (Annexure-1) of petitioner no. 1, an elected member of the Gram Panchayat has been forged.
3. Filing of a PIL seeking to question a proposal, by petitioner no. 1 alongwith 8 others on the ground that the signatures on the proposal are forged, cannot be countenanced. The petitioners, if their allegation is correct, have to take steps in accordance with law.
4. Filing of a PIL is not a panacea for every malady.
5. In view thereof, the petition is dismissed. November 17, 2025 SL/Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Desh Mitra Anand Counsel for Respondent(s) : Tushar Verma (A.C.S.C.), Dilip Kumar Pandey (Jaspreet Singh, J) (Arun Bhansali, CJ) Rakesh Maurya and 8 others .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. through Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Panchayati Raj and 6 others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHYAM LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench