FAREED AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9280/2025 · 2025-11-13
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179423 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179423 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9280 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.142 of 2015, Smt. Babli Vs. Fareed and others, under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 IPC and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Kotwali City, District Hardoi and the summoning order dated 15.01.2015 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hardoi. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he does not want to press this application on merits. However, he submits that applicant no.1, who is the husband, will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. He prays that applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386). 4. It is, therefore, directed that in case applicant no.1 surrenders before the Court below within two weeks from today and prefers bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Fareed And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
5. So far as applicants no.2 to 5 are concerned, learned counsel for the applicants submits that he would like to file an application for discharge under the provisions of Cr.P.C., to which learned counsel for the State, does not have any objection. 6. Accordingly, applicants no.2 to 5 are granted liberty to file an application for discharge in conformity with the provisions of Cr.P.C., within a period of two weeks from today. After the said application is filed, learned trial court is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter. Applicants no.2 to 5 are also granted liberty to appear through their counsel. Till expiry of six weeks or till disposal of the discharge application, whichever is earlier, further proceedings against applicants no.2 to 5 in the aforesaid complaint case shall remain stayed. 7.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, this application stands disposed of. November 13, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 9280 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench