TUFAIL @ TUFAIL KHAN v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1634/2025 · 2025-11-04
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179410 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1634 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.15 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 341(1) of BNS and Section 66(C) of the Information Technology Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Bahraich.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the co-accused on similar allegation was granted the benefit of anticipatory bail vide order dated 25.08.2025, a copy whereof has been filed as Annexure-6 to the bail application. The criminal antecedents of the applicant has been disclosed in paragraph 17 of the bail application.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer.
5. Considering and adopting the same reasoning as contained in the order dated 25.08.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled for the benefit of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed.
6. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Tufail @ Tufail Khan be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajey Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Tufail @ Tufail Khan .....Applicant(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
conclusion of the trial on his furnishing personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 4, 2025 R.C.
NABAIL No. 1634 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench