HAFIJ AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/11051/2025 · 2025-12-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179404 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 179404 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 11051 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard Shri Pawan Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner inter alia, praying therein for the following relief:-
"(i.) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, directing the opposite parties no. 1 to 4 to insure the compliance of order dated 17.05.2024 passed by Learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Kaiserganj, Bahraich in civil case no. 1095 of 2024 Hafij Vs. Neeraj & others, contain as annexure no. 1, in the ends of justice."
3. Upon perusal of the relevant records and after hearing the parties, we are of the view that the learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Kaiserganj, Bahraich should hear out the Order XXXIX Rule 2A application filed by the petitioner therein, expeditiously.
4. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. December 1, 2025 Lokesh Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pawan Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manjive Shukla,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Hafij Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench