Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1794 (UTT)

AMIT RAWAT AND ANR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/73/2025 · 2025-02-20

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No.73 of 2025 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. K.K. Harbola, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Bhaskar Ch. Joshi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Mr. Dheeraj Joshi, learned counsel for respondent no.3. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner made a statement at bar that in order to seek the appropriate remedy under law against submission of charge-sheet by the I.O., he may be permitted to withdraw present writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. 5. As prayed for, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 20.02.2025 R.Dang